Home / Directory / AI SaaS tooling / AI GTM data enrichment / Surfe
Surfe
B2B contact enrichment tool from Paris that finds emails and mobile numbers through a waterfall of data providers and syncs them to the CRM from LinkedIn and Gmail.
Sales and RevOps teams at growing B2B companies that prospect on LinkedIn and want verified emails and phone numbers synced to the CRM without manual entry.
Teams that need a large static contact database for bulk list buying, or buyers with no CRM.
Verdict
Surfe is a sales data company in Paris, France, founded in 2020 as Leadjet by David Maurice Chevalier and Romain Ginestou. Its tool enriches contacts with emails and mobile numbers by checking more than 15 data providers in a waterfall, and it syncs that data to CRMs from LinkedIn, Gmail, and other places where reps work. RevOps teams use it to keep CRM records complete while reps prospect.
Score Breakdown
How Surfe scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.
Pricing
Surfe publishes per-user plan prices billed annually. Email and mobile credits come with each tier.
| Plan | Price | What stands out |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 / user / month | 240 email and 60 mobile credits a year; one CRM add per day |
| Essential | $39 / user / month billed annually | More credits and full CRM sync |
| Pro | $79 / user / month billed annually | Higher credit limits for heavier prospecting |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom credits and controls |
| CRM connector | $29 / month | Separate module for CRM sync |
The Field at a Glance
How Surfe compares with other AI GTM data enrichment vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.
Surfe scores 7.8 in AI GTM data enrichment, level with Wiza (7.8), and ahead of FullEnrich (7.7) and Prospeo (7.6). Relative cost lands lower for this subcategory.
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn prospecting to CRM | Strong | One-click add from LinkedIn into the CRM. |
| Waterfall enrichment | Strong | Checks 15+ data providers per contact. |
| Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive sync | Strong | Bidirectional CRM sync on paid plans. |
| API and MCP access | Mixed | Available for teams building their own workflows. |
| Bulk list purchases | Weak | Credit-based, not a static database export. |
| Teams without a CRM | Weak | CRM sync is the main reason to buy. |
Who it’s for
Good fit
- SDR and AE teams
- RevOps managers
- Agencies prospecting for clients
Poor fit
- Bulk list buyers
- Teams without a CRM
- Solo users needing high mobile volume for free
Review Excerpts
Below are excerpts from public reviews. Our team scoured public reviews, forums, and chat rooms to get a balanced view of customers' experience with this company. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch were excluded.
“Through the enrichment waterfall, you get the company, the email, the phone number - and all of that syncs to the CRM automatically.”
“With Surfe, we transformed the way we qualify the person we add to Salesforce”
Surfe's free plan includes 240 email credits and 60 mobile credits a year and limits CRM adds to one contact a day, and its paid prices are per user billed annually, so costs climb with team size.
Company Facts
- Founded
- 2020 (CB Insights)
- Headquarters
- Paris, France (CB Insights)
- Total funding raised
- $4.03M (CB Insights)
- Key investors
- 360 Capital Partners, TS Ventures (CB Insights)
- Customers
- Google, uber, spendesk, Mirakl and Personio (CB Insights)
- Website
- surfe.com
Key Leadership
David Chevalier
Co-founder and CEO
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Surfe for buyers comparing options in ai gtm data enrichment. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Surfe did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for ai gtm data enrichment)
- Contact data coverage
- CRM sync
- Ease of use for reps
- Credit limits on lower tiers
- Company & commercial
- Innovation & product leadership
- Project management & communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the fit pattern described above.
Scope
Surfe is graded here as ai gtm data enrichment. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.