Home / Directory / AI SaaS tooling / AI sales coaching & roleplay / Quantified
Quantified
AI roleplay and field coaching platform from Austin built for pharma, medical device, and other regulated sales teams.
Pharma and medical device commercial teams training reps on disease states, clinical data, and compliant conversations with doctors.
SaaS or general B2B sales teams, and small teams that want a published price and a quick self-serve start.
Verdict
Quantified is an AI sales coaching company in Austin, Texas, founded in 2012 by Noah Zandan and Peter Zandan out of years of work measuring how people communicate. Life sciences companies use it to have reps practice conversations with AI doctors and other customers, score them against approved messaging, and certify them before launches and field rides. It earns a place because pharma reps work under medical, legal, and regulatory review, and Quantified builds that review into scoring and records instead of leaving it to managers.
Score Breakdown
How Quantified scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.
Pricing
Quantified does not publish prices. Its pricing page describes packages and sends buyers to sales for a quote.
Packages are built from AI Roleplay, AI coaching before and after field calls, compliance scoring, self-authoring of simulations, and reporting. Enterprise contracts include SOC 2 Type II controls and a private LLM.
The Field at a Glance
How Quantified compares with other AI sales coaching & roleplay vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.
Quantified scores 7.2 in AI sales coaching & roleplay, under Yoodli (7.6), Hyperbound (7.5), and Second Nature (7.3). Relative cost lands upper for this subcategory.
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Pharma rep certification | Strong | Built for disease state, clinical data, and HCP conversations. |
| Product launch readiness | Strong | Pitched on certifying reps in days with audit-ready records. |
| Compliance and on-label checks | Strong | Scoring flags off-label language and keeps audit-ready records. |
| Medical device and insurance sales | Mixed | Supported, but most scenarios and customers are pharma. |
| SaaS or general B2B sales | Weak | Personas and scoring lean heavily toward life sciences. |
| Small teams on a budget | Weak | No published plans; sold as enterprise contracts. |
Who it’s for
Good fit
- Pharma commercial training teams
- Medical device sales organizations
- Companies with MLR review on every rep message
Poor fit
- SaaS SDR and AE teams
- Small teams that want a monthly plan
- Buyers who need a quick self-serve trial
Review Excerpts
Below are excerpts from public reviews. Our team scoured public reviews, forums, and chat rooms to get a balanced view of customers' experience with this company. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch were excluded.
“It wasn’t enough for our team to simply understand or memorize the disease state data and clinical statistics. It was more important for them to transform that into impactful and compelling customer dialogues.”
“Quantified allows our sales representatives to present and answer real questions they will encounter from our prospects. It has improved opportunity progression through the sales cycle by 13.97% in the first 4 months after deploying Quantified.”
“Most of the ready-made scenarios are built around doctors and pharma reps. We sell software, so we had to write our own buyer personas from scratch before it was useful for our team.”
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Quantified for buyers comparing options in ai sales coaching & roleplay. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Quantified did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for ai sales coaching & roleplay)
- Life sciences roleplay realism
- Compliance & on-label scoring
- Coaching analytics
- Fit outside life sciences
- Company & commercial
- Innovation & product leadership
- Project management & communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the fit pattern described above.
Scope
Quantified is graded here as ai sales coaching & roleplay. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.