Home / Directory / Talent, learning & services markets / Recruiting & staffing / Turing
Turing
Talent network that matches remote engineers and other specialists, including AI-related roles, to companies.
Companies that need vetted remote engineers for defined AI or software work and can evaluate a trial.
Executive search, or roles so vague that no trial task exists.
Verdict
Use Turing when you can describe the work, run a paid trial, and manage contractors across time zones. The match is only as good as the task you score. Skip it for unnamed AI strategy roles, or if you need someone in a specific office under a staff employment model.
Score Breakdown
How Turing scores on the jobs buyers hire it for, and on the company and commercial side of the deal.
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Defined remote engineering seats | Strong | If you will score a trial. |
| Short specialist bursts | Mixed | Possible with a tight brief. |
| Unspecified AI leadership | Poor | No task to match. |
| Local staff employment | Poor | Different employment model. |
Who it’s for
Good fit
- Teams with a written work sample
- Remote-friendly engineering orgs
- Buyers who will manage contractors
Poor fit
- Vague AI transformation seats
- Local-only staff roles
- No one to review the trial
Review Excerpts
Below are excerpts from public reviews. Our team scoured public reviews, forums, and chat rooms to get a balanced view of customers' experience with this company. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch were excluded.
“We collaborated with them for acquiring mobile developers for feature upgrades in our app. The entire process was seamless because we were able to on-board the developers within 3 weeks. Moreover, Turing.com has variety of developers across tech stacks and they were able to meet our requirements.”
“Their Dev Success and customer success teams were in touch with us throughout the engagement and were super proactive.”
“Honestly, As I stated, Turing was a total waste of my and my company's time. We cannot employ outside of the US or Canada, even though an agency like this. If they were upfront about what they truly are, and overseas employment agency, I would have never signed up for it.”
“I would rate Turing much higher if they had viable candidates that were US residents. Their candidates are qualified, but unusable in most companies.”
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Turing for buyers comparing options in recruiting & staffing. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Turing did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for recruiting & staffing)
- Vetting and match
- Trial practicality
- Remote operating fit
- Role clarity
- Company & commercial
- Innovation &
- product leadership
- Project management &
- communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the fit pattern described above.
Scope
Turing is graded here as recruiting & staffing. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.