Home / Directory / Trust, legal & compliance / Governance & policy tooling / Trustible
Trustible
Washington, D.C.-area company that helps regulated enterprises take in, inventory, risk-score, and approve AI use cases and keep audit-ready records.
Legal, risk, and AI governance teams at regulated enterprises that need one inventory of AI use and a defensible approval trail.
Teams that need technical model testing or runtime security, or buyers who want a large vendor with a long record.
Verdict
Trustible is a governance company that helps large organizations track every AI project, score its risk, and keep evidence for regulators. It suits legal, risk, and compliance teams in regulated industries that are approving more AI use cases each month. Its focus on intake and documentation matters as rules like the EU AI Act take effect.
Score Breakdown
How Trustible scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.
Pricing
Trustible does not publish prices. Quotes come through a demo request.
Trustible sells its governance software to enterprises on custom terms, with an implementation plan for the first 30, 60, and 90 days.
The Field at a Glance
How Trustible compares with other governance and policy tooling vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.
Trustible scores 7.5 in governance and policy tooling, ahead of Credo AI (7.3), Immuta (7.1), Collibra (6.7), and Alation (6.0). Relative cost lands upper-mid for this subcategory.
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Use case intake | Strong | Routes each use case by risk. |
| AI inventory | Strong | One record for models, agents, and vendors. |
| Regulation tracking | Strong | Maps work to the EU AI Act and NIST framework. |
| Audit trail | Strong | Evidence builds as work happens. |
| Technical model testing | Weak | Governance workflows, not model testing. |
| Vendor scale | Weak | Seven employees in June 2025. |
Who it’s for
Good fit
- Regulated enterprises
- Legal and compliance teams
- Chief AI officers
Poor fit
- Teams needing runtime guardrails
- Buyers wanting list prices
- Small companies with few AI projects
Review Excerpts
Below are excerpts from public reviews. Our team scoured public reviews, forums, and chat rooms to get a balanced view of customers' experience with this company. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch were excluded.
“Trustible turbocharged our use case throughput, unlocking greater speed in our AI deployment across the organization.”
“We're a small team on the Ashoka staff, and Trustible has helped us do huge, giant level work.”
Trustible publishes no prices, and its staff numbered seven in June 2025, small for a vendor selling to regulated enterprises.
Company Facts
- Public launch
- April 2023 (Trustible)
- Office
- Rosslyn, Virginia (Technical.ly)
- Latest funding
- $4.6M seed led by Lookout Ventures, June 2025 (Trustible)
- Employees
- 7 (June 2025) (Technical.ly)
- Founders
- Gerald Kierce (CEO) and Andrew Gamino-Cheong (CTO) (Trustible)
- Website
- trustible.ai
Key Leadership
Gerald Kierce
Co-founder and CEO
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Trustible for buyers comparing options in governance and policy tooling. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Trustible did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for governance and policy tooling)
- AI intake and risk workflow
- Regulation tracking
- Vendor scale
- Price visibility
- Company & commercial
- Innovation & product leadership
- Project management & communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the fit pattern described above.
Scope
Trustible is graded here as governance and policy tooling. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.