Home / Directory / Trust, legal & compliance / Deepfake detection / Sensity AI
Sensity AI
Amsterdam company founded in 2018 that detects deepfake images, video, and audio for law enforcement, governments, banks, and insurers, and produces forensic reports built for use in court.
Police forensic units, government agencies, insurers, and banks that need deepfake findings they can explain and defend in legal proceedings.
Teams that want self-serve sign-up with list prices, or companies that mainly need live meeting protection.
Verdict
Sensity AI is an Amsterdam deepfake detection company whose reports are designed to stand up as evidence. It suits law enforcement, government, and insurance teams that review large volumes of suspect media. Its founder trained an early deepfake detector in 2018, and the company has focused on forensics since.
Score Breakdown
How Sensity AI scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.
Pricing
Sensity AI does not list prices on its website. It sells its web app, API, and on-premises deployments after a demo.
Sensity AI licenses its detection platform for cloud or on-premises use, with API access, to public agencies and companies.
The Field at a Glance
How Sensity AI compares with other deepfake detection vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.
Sensity AI scores 7.5 in deepfake detection, under Reality Defender (8.1), Resemble AI (8.1), and GetReal Security (7.6). Relative cost lands mid-band for this subcategory.
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Court-ready reports | Strong | Audit trails, confidence scores, and visual evidence. |
| Multilayer analysis | Strong | Checks pixels, audio, metadata, and file structure. |
| On-premises deployment | Strong | Runs on customer servers for sensitive evidence. |
| Automated screening | Strong | Screens media as evidence is ingested. |
| Live meeting protection | Mixed | Built mainly for file and URL analysis. |
| Published prices | Weak | No list prices on the website. |
Who it’s for
Good fit
- Police and forensic labs
- Government and defense agencies
- Insurers and banks investigating fraud
Poor fit
- Buyers wanting self-serve list prices
- Teams focused on live calls
- Small teams with occasional checks
Review Excerpts
Below are excerpts from public reviews. Our team scoured public reviews, forums, and chat rooms to get a balanced view of customers' experience with this company. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch were excluded.
Sensity AI says its tools save investigators about 35 minutes of manual review per case and are deployed in more than 30 countries.
Every Sensity AI analysis comes with a forensic report that includes confidence scores, visual indicators, and an audit trail, designed for use in court proceedings.
Sensity AI lists no prices on its website, so buyers must book a demo to learn what the platform or API costs.
Company Facts
- Founded
- 2018 (Sensity AI)
- Headquarters
- Amsterdam, Netherlands (Sensity AI)
- Founders
- Giorgio Patrini (CEO) and Francesco Cavalli (COO) (Sensity AI)
- Latest round
- $2.1M led by Auriga Cyber Ventures, January 2026, bringing total capital raised to $3.2M (Sensity AI)
- EU funding
- Selected for the European Innovation Council Accelerator in July 2026, including a grant of about $2.9M (Sensity AI)
- Footprint
- Deployed in more than 30 countries, per the company (sensity.ai)
- Website
- sensity.ai
Key Leadership
Giorgio Patrini
Co-founder and CEO
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Sensity AI for buyers comparing options in deepfake detection. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Sensity AI did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for deepfake detection)
- Forensic reporting
- Detection across media types
- Price visibility
- Vendor scale
- Company & commercial
- Innovation & product leadership
- Project management & communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the fit pattern described above.
Scope
Sensity AI is graded here as deepfake detection. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.