Home / Directory / AI SaaS tooling / AI CI and build acceleration / Depot
Depot
Build acceleration company from YC W23 that speeds up Docker image builds and GitHub Actions with a shared remote cache, and now runs its own Depot CI engine.
Teams with slow Docker or multi-platform image builds that want faster builds in CI and on laptops through a shared cache.
Teams with small, fast builds that would not use the cache, or buyers who need a fully custom enterprise quote to see prices.
Verdict
Depot is worth using for teams whose Docker builds are the slowest part of CI, especially with ARM or multi-platform images. Its shared cache also speeds up local builds for developers. Teams with small, fast builds will see less benefit.
Score Breakdown
How Depot scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.
Pricing
Depot publishes Developer and Startup plan prices plus per-minute overage rates.
| Plan | Price | What stands out |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | $20 / month | 1 user; 500 Docker build minutes; 2,000 Depot CI and 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes |
| Startup | $200 / month | Unlimited users; 5,000 Docker build minutes; 20,000 CI and 20,000 Actions minutes |
| Business | Custom | Custom minutes and support |
| Overage | Per minute | Docker builds $0.04; GitHub Actions $0.006; sandboxes $0.01 |
The Field at a Glance
How Depot compares with other AI CI and build acceleration vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.
Depot scores 7.9 in AI CI and build acceleration, under Blacksmith (8.0), level with Namespace (7.9), and ahead of WarpBuild (7.8). Relative cost lands lower for this subcategory.
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Docker image builds | Strong | Persistent remote cache and native multi-arch builders. |
| ARM and multi-platform images | Strong | Native ARM avoids slow emulation. |
| GitHub Actions runners | Strong | Managed runners with fast cache throughput. |
| Local developer builds | Strong | Laptops share the same build cache. |
| Business plan pricing | Weak | Above Startup, pricing is custom. |
| Teams with tiny builds | Weak | Cache gains are small for quick builds. |
Who it’s for
Good fit
- Teams shipping container images
- Platform and DevOps engineers
- ARM and multi-arch builders
Poor fit
- Teams with tiny builds
- Buyers needing list enterprise prices
- Non-container workloads only
Review Excerpts
Below are excerpts from public reviews. Our team scoured public reviews, forums, and chat rooms to get a balanced view of customers' experience with this company. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch were excluded.
“Depot took our build and push from 30 minutes to 4, and with cache it should be around 12 seconds.”
“Since migrating from the default GitHub runner, our Docker image build times have literally been cut in half.”
Depot's Developer plan includes 500 Docker build minutes a month, and extra Docker build time costs $0.04 a minute, so busy teams move to Startup at $200 a month.
Company Facts
- Founded
- 2022 (CB Insights)
- Headquarters
- Beaverton, Oregon, United States (CB Insights)
- Employees
- About 22 (Y Combinator)
- Total funding raised
- $14.6M (CB Insights)
- Key investors
- Y Combinator, Pioneer Fund, Felicis, Tokyo Black, Aviso Ventures (CB Insights)
- Accelerator
- Y Combinator, Winter 2023 batch (Y Combinator)
- Website
- depot.dev
Key Leadership
Kyle Galbraith
Co-founder and CEO
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Depot for buyers comparing options in ai ci and build acceleration. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Depot did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for ai ci and build acceleration)
- Docker build speed
- Shared build cache
- GitHub Actions runners
- Business-tier price transparency
- Company & commercial
- Innovation & product leadership
- Project management & communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the fit pattern described above.
Scope
Depot is graded here as ai ci and build acceleration. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.