Home / Directory / Agents & orchestration / AI agent tool integrations / Composio
Composio
San Francisco company founded in 2023 that gives AI agents secure access to more than 1,500 apps, with managed sign-in, tool calls, triggers, and an MCP gateway.
Developers and teams building agents that need many app connections fast, with OAuth, API keys, and token refresh handled for them.
Teams that need only a handful of deep, custom integrations, or regulated buyers who want compliance add-ons included on a low tier.
Verdict
Composio is worth using for teams that want their agents to act across many apps without building sign-in and tool code for each one. Its catalog of more than 1,500 apps makes it an easy place to start. Teams with a few critical integrations may prefer to own that code.
Score Breakdown
How Composio scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.
Pricing
Composio publishes a free plan, a $29 Pro plan with usage credit, and custom Enterprise pricing. Compliance and security features are priced as add-ons on Pro.
| Plan | Price | What stands out |
|---|---|---|
| Hobby | $0 | 100,000 tool calls, 50,000 triggers, 3 team members a month |
| Pro | $29 / month | $29 monthly usage credit, unlimited team members, spend controls, all add-ons |
| Enterprise | Custom | Committed volume, discounts, annual invoicing |
| Composio-managed apps | 20,000 free tool calls a month | Then an extra $0.0002 per tool call |
| Compliance add-ons on Pro | BAA $0.0003 / call; IP allowlist $0.0001 / call | Included on Enterprise |
| Advanced white-label | $0.30 one-time per connection | Included on Enterprise |
The Field at a Glance
How Composio compares with other AI agent tool integrations vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.
Composio scores 8.1 in AI agent tool integrations, ahead of Nango (8.0), Arcade.dev (7.9), and Paragon (7.7). Relative cost lands lower for this subcategory.
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| App catalog | Strong | More than 1,500 apps and toolkits. |
| Managed sign-in | Strong | OAuth, API keys, and token refresh are handled. |
| Free usage | Strong | 100,000 tool calls a month on Hobby. |
| MCP access | Strong | One managed MCP endpoint for tools and agents. |
| Compliance on Pro | Mixed | BAA and IP allowlisting are paid add-ons. |
| Custom deep integrations | Mixed | Proxy calls cover endpoints without a prebuilt tool. |
Who it’s for
Good fit
- Agent startups needing many app connections
- Teams connecting Claude or ChatGPT to work apps
- Developers prototyping agent actions
Poor fit
- Teams needing a few deep custom integrations
- Regulated buyers on a small budget
- Projects with no third-party apps
Review Excerpts
Below are excerpts from public reviews. Our team scoured public reviews, forums, and chat rooms to get a balanced view of customers' experience with this company. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch were excluded.
Lightspeed reported that Composio engages more than 100,000 developers and covers tools across GitHub, Notion, Linear, Gmail, Slack, HubSpot, and Salesforce.
Composio's Hobby plan includes 100,000 tool calls, 50,000 triggers, and 3 team members a month at no cost, and connecting an app is a one-time secure sign-in.
Composio-managed apps include only 20,000 free tool calls a month and then add $0.0002 per call, and on Pro a HIPAA BAA costs an extra $0.0003 per tool call.
Company Facts
- Founded
- 2023 (Lightspeed)
- Total funding raised
- $29M (Composio)
- Latest funding
- $25M Series A led by Lightspeed, July 2025 (Lightspeed)
- Developers
- More than 100,000 (Lightspeed)
- Website
- composio.dev
Key Leadership
Soham Ganatra
Co-founder and CEO
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Composio for buyers comparing options in AI agent tool integrations. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Composio did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for AI agent tool integrations)
- Breadth of app catalog
- Managed auth and token refresh
- Free tier generosity
- Depth of custom integrations
- Company & commercial
- Innovation & product leadership
- Project management & communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the fit pattern described above.
Scope
Composio is graded here as AI agent tool integrations. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.