Home / Directory / Agents & orchestration / AI agent memory / Supermemory

Supermemory

San Francisco memory engine for AI agents that extracts and updates memories from files, chats, and apps, offered through an API, plugins, and an MCP server.

7.8/10
Overall Score
Recommend

Supermemory began as a weekly side project by its founder and now reports more than 100,000 organizations and over a trillion tokens a month, with a published rate card and self-hosting for large customers.

Best for

Developers who want fast memory recall for agents and apps, a low monthly entry price, and a clear per-token rate card.

Not ideal for

Regulated buyers who need compliance features on a low tier, or teams that want a long enterprise track record before committing.

Verdict

Supermemory is worth using for developers who want quick, low-cost memory for agents and apps with transparent usage rates. It suits teams moving off homemade retrieval pipelines. Regulated companies should plan on the Scale plan or an Enterprise contract.

Score Breakdown

How Supermemory scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.

Buyer outcomes

Recall speed
8.4
Developer setup
8.4
Usage pricing clarity
7.6
Enterprise track record
7.0

Company & commercial

Innovation & product leadership
8.1
Project management & communication
7.6
Pricing
7.9
Contract fairness
7.6

Pricing

Supermemory publishes plan prices that include monthly credits, plus a rate card. Memory ingestion costs $5 per million tokens for plain text on every plan.

PlanPriceWhat stands out
Free$0$5 of credits a month
Pro$19 / month$20 of credits, 3 team seats, priority support
Max$100 / month$130 of credits, Gmail connector
Scale$399 / month$600 of credits, advanced PDF extraction, S3 and web crawler connectors, SOC 2 and HIPAA BAA, self-hosted option
EnterpriseCustomAir-gapped self-hosting, SSO, custom contracts, uptime SLA

The Field at a Glance

How Supermemory compares with other AI agent memory vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.

6 7 8 9 Overall Score $ $$ $$$ $$$$ Relative typical engagement cost Mem0 Zep Letta Cognee Supermemory 7.8
Supermemory Mem0 Zep Letta Cognee

Supermemory scores 7.8 in AI agent memory, under Mem0 (8.0) and Zep (7.9), level with Letta (7.8), and ahead of Cognee (7.7). Relative cost lands lower for this subcategory.

Use-case matrix

Use caseFitNotes
Recall latencyStrongMedian search server time is listed at 187ms.
Low entry priceStrongPro costs $19 a month with $20 of credits.
Published rate cardStrongPer-token and per-query rates are public.
Self-hostingMixedSelf-hosting starts on Scale and Enterprise.
Compliance on low tiersWeakSOC 2 and HIPAA BAA start on Scale.
Long track recordWeakThe company raised its seed round in 2025.

Who it’s for

Good fit

  • AI app developers
  • Coding agent and assistant builders
  • Startups replacing homemade retrieval

Poor fit

  • Regulated buyers on small budgets
  • Teams wanting a long vendor history
  • Projects without repeat users

Review Excerpts

Below are excerpts from public reviews. Our team scoured public reviews, forums, and chat rooms to get a balanced view of customers' experience with this company. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch were excluded.

How it's used

“We just ditched RAG completely and went memory only through supermemory. Reduced avg response time from 40s → 12s. Using about 40–50% fewer tokens.”

Armin Daryabegi, Founder of Chatarmin, company testimonial published by Supermemory · supermemory.ai pricing page
What people like

“supermemory let us scale usage without losing the thread of every conversation.”

Max Peters, Founder of Adapta, company testimonial published by Supermemory · supermemory.ai pricing page
What people don't like

Supermemory's advanced PDF extraction, S3 and web crawler connectors, and SOC 2 and HIPAA BAA coverage start on the Scale plan at $399 a month.

Product fact · Supermemory pricing

Company Facts

Headquarters
San Francisco (Supermemory)
Key investors
Susa Ventures, Browder Capital, SF1.vc (TechCrunch)
Website
supermemory.ai

Key Leadership

Methodology

This page is an independent evaluation of Supermemory for buyers comparing options in AI agent memory. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Supermemory did not pay for this review.

What we scored

The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.

  • Buyer outcomes (for AI agent memory)
    • Recall speed
    • Developer setup
    • Usage pricing clarity
    • Enterprise track record
  • Company & commercial
    • Innovation & product leadership
    • Project management & communication
    • Pricing
    • Contract fairness

Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.

Score Composition

InputWeightWhat it covers
Reviews40%A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch are out of scope.
Product35%Hands-on look at screens and workflows.
Pricing15%Whether the price looks fair for what you get.
Docs & training10%Docs, tutorials, and training material.

How we balanced the evidence

The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the fit pattern described above.

Scope

Supermemory is graded here as AI agent memory. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.

← Back to AI agent memory