Home / Directory / AI SaaS tooling / AI spreadsheet analysts / Quadratic
Quadratic
AI spreadsheet for technical analysts that combines formulas with Python and SQL cells, charts, and collaborative cloud workbooks.
Data scientists and technical analysts who want an AI spreadsheet with Python and SQL cells without jumping to a full notebook stack.
Finance teams that mainly need warehouse-connected board packs with forward-deployed analyst onboarding.
Verdict
Quadratic is a fair fit when your analysts already think in code and want that power inside a spreadsheet canvas with AI help. Published Personal, Pro, and Business seat plans are easy to budget. Practitioners like Python and SQL cells; finance buyers who need trusted live company metrics with implementation help may still prefer Equals.
Score Breakdown
How Quadratic scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.
Pricing
Quadratic publishes Personal, Pro, Business, and Enterprise plans on quadratichq.com/pricing. Figures below are USD list signals as of September 2026 when billed annually.
| Plan / SKU | Meter | Price (USD) | What stands out |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal | per user / month | $0 | Limited AI, sharing, and connections |
| Pro | per user / month | $18 | $20/mo AI credits; unlimited sharing |
| Business | per user / month | $36 | $40/mo AI credits; on-demand AI |
| Enterprise | annual | Custom quote | SSO, self-host, dedicated support |
The Field at a Glance
How Quadratic compares with other AI spreadsheet analysts vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.
Quadratic scores 6.8 in AI spreadsheet analysts, behind Equals (8.0), Omni (7.8), and Julius AI (7.0). Relative cost is lower on published Pro seats versus annual analytics workspaces.
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Python/SQL spreadsheet analysis | Strong | Core Quadratic motion. |
| AI-assisted grid authoring | Strong | Product emphasis. |
| Published low seat pricing | Strong | Clear Pro/Business cards. |
| Finance-grade live connectors | Mixed | Equals sharper. |
| Forward-deployed analytics onboarding | Weak | Equals lane. |
| Contract CLM | Poor | Wrong subcategory. |
Who it’s for
Good fit
- Technical analysts who live in Python
- Teams prototyping AI spreadsheet workflows
- Buyers who want cheap published seats
Poor fit
- Finance orgs that need warehouse board packs first
- Teams that ban code in spreadsheets
- Buyers shopping for voice agents
Review Excerpts
Below are excerpts from public reviews. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch were excluded.
“Quadratic has now become one of my tabs. Every day I tidy my workspace and close any tabs that I won't use for the day. There are a few which I use every day and never close - Quadratic is now one of them!”
“Having Python and SQL beside formulas meant fewer round trips to a separate notebook just to clean a column.”
“Quadratic Pro’s AI credit allotment felt tight for heavy agent use. We needed Business or on-demand credits to standardize.”
“We load warehouse extracts into Quadratic, run Python transforms in-grid, and share the workbook with analytics peers.”
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Quadratic for buyers comparing options in ai spreadsheet analysts. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Quadratic did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for ai spreadsheet analysts)
- Python/SQL in-grid power
- AI spreadsheet authoring
- Published seat pricing clarity
- Finance-grade live connector depth
- Company & commercial
- Innovation & product leadership
- Project management & communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the fit pattern described above.
Scope
Quadratic is graded here as ai spreadsheet analysts. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.