Home / Directory / AI SaaS tooling / AI RFP & proposal generation / Conveyor

Conveyor

Company founded in 2021 that uses AI agents to fill out customer security questionnaires and RFPs, run a trust center, and keep answer libraries current for B2B sales teams.

7.9/10
Overall Score
Recommend

Conveyor focuses on security questionnaires, says its agent completes more than 90% of questions on its own, and has added RFP responses on the same platform.

Best for

Security, compliance, and sales teams at B2B software companies that answer many security questionnaires and RFPs each quarter.

Not ideal for

Teams that only need a document-heavy proposal design tool, or buyers who want posted prices for automation.

Verdict

Conveyor is a customer trust company whose AI agents fill out security questionnaires and RFPs and run a public trust center. It suits B2B software sellers whose deals stall on security reviews. Its founder built it after years of answering the same compliance questions at Aptible.

Score Breakdown

How Conveyor scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.

Buyer outcomes

Security questionnaire accuracy
8.7
Trust center
8.5
Price visibility
6.6
RFP depth beyond security
7.4

Company & commercial

Innovation & product leadership
8.1
Project management & communication
7.9
Pricing
7.8
Contract fairness
8.0

Pricing

Conveyor offers a free trust center plan and quotes its usage-based Enterprise plan, with no per-user fees.

Conveyor charges by usage on Enterprise, with unlimited users and integrations included and volume discounts, and gives away a basic trust center.

The Field at a Glance

How Conveyor compares with other AI RFP & proposal generation vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.

6 7 8 9 Overall Score $ $$ $$$ $$$$ Relative typical engagement cost AutogenAI Arphie Proposify Responsive QorusDocs Conveyor 7.9
Conveyor AutogenAI Arphie Proposify Responsive QorusDocs

Conveyor scores 7.9 in AI RFP & proposal generation, ahead of AutogenAI (7.7), Arphie (7.5), Proposify (7.4), Responsive (7.1), and QorusDocs (6.6). Relative cost lands upper-mid for this subcategory.

Use-case matrix

Use caseFitNotes
Security questionnairesStrongFills most questions with cited answers.
Trust centerStrongFree tier for sharing security documents.
Knowledge upkeepStrongMonitors and cleans answer libraries.
Unlimited usersStrongNo per-user fees on Enterprise.
Complex RFP designMixedNewer to full proposal responses.
Published pricesWeakEnterprise is quoted.

Who it’s for

Good fit

  • B2B software security teams
  • Sales teams facing security reviews
  • GRC teams with large question libraries

Poor fit

  • Teams needing designed proposal documents
  • Buyers wanting list prices
  • Companies with few security reviews

Review Excerpts

Below are excerpts from public reviews. Our team scoured public reviews, forums, and chat rooms to get a balanced view of customers' experience with this company. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch were excluded.

How it's used

Conveyor says its AI agent fully completes more than 90% of customer security questions on its own, for more than 400 customers including Netflix and Zapier.

Company claim · TechCrunch
What people like

“We don't need to review everything anymore. It's comforting knowing the AI isn't going to give me answers that don't make sense.”

Annie Stankiewicz, GRC Program Manager at Zapier, testimonial published by Conveyor · conveyor.com
What people don't like

Conveyor's free plan covers only a trust center with 10 credits a month, without questionnaire automation or integrations, which require the quoted Enterprise plan.

Product fact · Conveyor pricing

Company Facts

Founded
2021 (TechCrunch)
Founder
Chas Ballew (CEO) (TechCrunch)
Series A
$12.5M led by Cervin Ventures, October 2023 (TechCrunch)
Series B
$20M led by SignalFire, 2025 (TechCrunch)
Customers
More than 400, including Netflix, Zapier, and Carta, per the company (TechCrunch)
Website
conveyor.com

Key Leadership

Chas Ballew

Chas Ballew

Founder and CEO

Methodology

This page is an independent evaluation of Conveyor for buyers comparing options in ai rfp & proposal generation. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Conveyor did not pay for this review.

What we scored

The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.

  • Buyer outcomes (for ai rfp & proposal generation)
    • Security questionnaire accuracy
    • Trust center
    • Price visibility
    • RFP depth beyond security
  • Company & commercial
    • Innovation & product leadership
    • Project management & communication
    • Pricing
    • Contract fairness

Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.

Score Composition

InputWeightWhat it covers
Reviews40%A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch are out of scope.
Product35%Hands-on look at screens and workflows.
Pricing15%Whether the price looks fair for what you get.
Docs & training10%Docs, tutorials, and training material.

How we balanced the evidence

The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the fit pattern described above.

Scope

Conveyor is graded here as ai rfp & proposal generation. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.

← Back to AI RFP & proposal generation