Home / Directory / AI infrastructure / Power, cooling & facility ops / Asetek

Asetek

Public liquid-cooling OEM for data-center and high-density AI racks, spanning rack-level and facility thermal loops used in HPC and AI campuses.

6.8/10
Overall Score
Conditional recommend

Asetek brings rare public financials into AI liquid cooling, which helps diligence. Product fit is real for dense racks, but OEM channel dynamics and project integration mean our recommendation is conditional.

Best for

Operators and OEMs specifying liquid cooling for high-density AI or HPC racks who value a publicly reported thermal supplier.

Not ideal for

Buyers who only need facility-level immersion tanks, or teams shopping for GPU cloud capacity rather than cooling hardware.

Verdict

Asetek is a good fit when your AI or HPC design needs liquid cooling from a public OEM with disclosed financials. FY2025 revenue was about $41.5M, which helps size the vendor, but deployments still ride through OEM and integrator channels. Practitioners like thermal performance on dense racks; schedule risk and channel packaging are the usual caveats versus immersion specialists.

Score Breakdown

How Asetek scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.

Buyer outcomes

Liquid cooling performance
7.1
AI / HPC density fit
6.9
OEM / channel readiness
6.6
Project delivery support
6.5

Company & commercial

Innovation & product leadership
6.8
Project management & communication
6.7
Pricing
7.0
Contract fairness
6.8

The Field at a Glance

Where Asetek ranks among Power, cooling & facility ops vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.

6 7 8 9 Overall Score $ $$ $$$ $$$$ Relative typical engagement cost Utilidata Submer Green Revolution Cooling Asetek 6.8
Asetek Utilidata Submer Green Revolution Cooling

Asetek scores 6.8 among power/cooling peers, behind Utilidata (7.8) and ahead of Submer (6.7) and Green Revolution Cooling (6.4). Relative cost is mid-to-high because liquid-cooling OEM deals are project-quoted.

Use-case matrix

Use caseFitNotes
Rack liquid cooling loopsStrongCore OEM offering.
High-density AI rack thermalStrongAI/HPC positioning.
Facility immersion tanksMixedLess immersion-first than Submer/GRC.
Grid / power orchestration softwareWeakUtilidata lane.
GPU cloud rentalPoorWrong subcategory.
Consumer PC cooling onlyWeakData-center AI focus here.

Who it’s for

Good fit

  • Colo and campus teams specifying liquid cooling for AI racks
  • OEMs needing a public thermal supplier
  • HPC operators refreshing dense compute halls

Poor fit

  • Buyers who only want immersion tanks
  • Teams buying GPU hours, not cooling hardware
  • Purchasers needing only power-grid orchestration software

Review Excerpts

Below are excerpts from public reviews. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch were excluded.

What people like

“Asetek being a public OEM with audited numbers made the thermal review easier than with a purely private cooling startup.”

Facility engineer · r/datacenter
What people like

“Liquid loops on dense racks ran quieter and cooler than our prior air-only design once the CDU side was commissioned.”

Facility engineer · r/datacenter
What people don't like

“You still inherit OEM and integrator schedules; Asetek is not a turnkey GPU cloud.”

Datacenter ops · r/datacenter
How it's used

“We specify Asetek loops in the rack BOM and let the facility integrator own CDU tie-in and commissioning.”

Site engineer · r/datacenter

Methodology

This page is an independent evaluation of Asetek for buyers comparing options in power, cooling & facility ops. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Asetek did not pay for this review.

What we scored

The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria fall under it in two groups.

  • Buyer outcomes (for power, cooling & facility ops)
    • Liquid cooling performance
    • AI / HPC density fit
    • OEM / channel readiness
    • Project delivery support
  • Company & commercial
    • Innovation & product leadership
    • Project management & communication
    • Pricing
    • Contract fairness

Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.

Score Composition

InputWeightWhat it covers
Reviews40%A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites such as Clutch are out of scope.
Product35%Hands-on look at screens and workflows.
Pricing15%Whether the price looks fair for what you get.
Docs & training10%Docs, tutorials, and training material.

How we balanced the evidence

The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the fit pattern described above.

Scope

Asetek is graded here as power, cooling & facility ops. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.

← Back to Power, cooling & facility ops