Home / Research / Neocloud Market Statistics
Market research · September 17, 2026
Neocloud Market Statistics: 2026 Report
This report looks at specialist companies whose business is renting accelerated compute as of 2026. Those companies are called neoclouds: they operate between chip vendors and model developers, buying GPUs at scale, wrapping them in power, cooling, and high-speed networking, and selling the result by the GPU-hour or under multi-year contract.
We tracked 23 specialist providers using quarterly filings, shareholder letters, published rate cards, and announced power contracts. Where a company is private, we built figures from disclosed funding rounds, announced customer contracts, and capacity filings with utilities and planning authorities.
Leading Neoclouds by Revenue and Contracted Power
The table ranks the seven largest specialist providers by annualized revenue from third-quarter 2026 results, with the power they have energized and the power they have under contract. Contracted power is the better forward indicator, since a gigawatt under contract converts to revenue only as it comes online.
The Leading Neoclouds by Revenue and Contracted Power, 2026
| Provider | Annualized Revenue | Year-Over-Year Growth | Active Power | Contracted Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoreWeave | $12.2B | +108% | 1.6 GW | 3.9 GW |
| Nebius | $3.3B | +298% | 0.9 GW | 4.8 GW |
| Crusoe | $2.6B | +166% | 0.25 GW | 4.6 GW |
| Lambda | $1.4B | +98% | 0.18 GW | 0.9 GW |
| Together AI | $0.9B | +112% | 0.07 GW | 0.3 GW |
| Groq | $0.6B | +175% | 0.06 GW | 0.25 GW |
| Nscale | $0.6B | +240% | 0.12 GW | 1.3 GW |
Insights
- We found contracted power to exceed active power by a factor of 5.0 across the category, which means the revenue these companies will report in 2028 is already largely committed on both sides of the ledger.
- Our data showed Crusoe and Nebius each holding more contracted power than CoreWeave while generating less than a third of its revenue, a gap that reflects build timelines rather than demand.
- We recorded seven providers above half a billion dollars in annualized revenue, up from two at the same point in 2024.
Neocloud Quarterly Revenue, Q1 2024 to Q3 2026
The category's growth is easier to read quarter by quarter than in annual totals, because the largest contracts step up as capacity energizes rather than ramping smoothly. In the table below, we separate CoreWeave and Nebius from the rest of the field, then plot all three series.
The Neocloud Quarterly Revenue, 2026
| Quarter | CoreWeave | Nebius | All Other Tracked Neoclouds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2024 | $330M | $24M | $215M |
| Q2 2024 | $470M | $31M | $262M |
| Q3 2024 | $655M | $39M | $335M |
| Q4 2024 | $890M | $51M | $398M |
| Q1 2025 | $1,040M | $74M | $465M |
| Q2 2025 | $1,255M | $121M | $572M |
| Q3 2025 | $1,465M | $205M | $688M |
| Q4 2025 | $1,720M | $348M | $845M |
| Q1 2026 | $2,110M | $405M | $1,020M |
| Q2 2026 | $2,610M | $590M | $1,235M |
| Q3 2026 | $3,050M | $815M | $1,530M |
Two things stand out in the shape of these curves. The first is that CoreWeave's lead has held in percentage terms while widening in absolute dollars, so the category is neither consolidating toward a single winner nor fragmenting toward many. The second is that the rest of the field, taken together, has grown faster than CoreWeave since the middle of 2025, which is what a maturing supply market looks like: the second and third tier providers are now winning contracts that would previously have gone to whoever had capacity first.
Customer Concentration and Contract Structure
The defining financial risk in this category is that a small number of customers account for most of the revenue, and those customers are also building their own capacity. In the table below, we report concentration and contract structure for the five providers with sufficient disclosure to measure it.
The Customer Concentration and Contract Structure, 2026
| Provider | Largest Customer Share | Top Three Share | Revenue Under Committed Contract | Median Contract Length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoreWeave | 61% | 82% | 95% | 4.2 years |
| Nebius | 44% | 71% | 88% | 3.5 years |
| Crusoe | 38% | 66% | 91% | 4.8 years |
| Lambda | 29% | 54% | 73% | 2.6 years |
| Together AI | 18% | 39% | 51% | 1.8 years |
Concentration of this order is normally a warning sign, and here it is partly the opposite. A four-year take-or-pay contract with a creditworthy counterparty is what allows these companies to raise the debt that buys the GPUs in the first place, so the concentration and the financing are the same fact viewed from two sides. The larger exposure arrives when the contract ends: the customer has by then built its own capacity, and the provider is left holding three-year-old accelerators in a market where the replacement generation is twice as efficient. The providers with the shortest contracts and the least concentration are also the ones with the lowest exposure to that scenario, which is a trade most of the category has chosen not to make.
Neocloud Unit Economics and Leverage
In the table below, we compare the accounting assumptions and balance sheets behind the revenue figures above. The depreciation schedule matters more than any other line: every year added to the assumed useful life of a GPU moves cost out of the current period and into a future one.
The Neocloud Unit Economics and Leverage, 2026
| Provider | GPU Depreciation Life | Adjusted EBITDA Margin | Net Margin | Debt Outstanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoreWeave | 6 years | 58% | -24% | $23.8B |
| Nebius | 4 years | 33% | -11% | $4.2B |
| Crusoe | 5 years | 41% | Not disclosed | $6.1B |
| Lambda | 5 years | 36% | -8% | $1.4B |
| Together AI | 4 years | 29% | -6% | $0.4B |
Insights
- We found a two-year spread in assumed GPU useful life across the category, which on a $30,000 accelerator is a difference of roughly $2,500 per card per year in reported cost.
- Our data showed adjusted EBITDA margins clustering between 29 and 58 percent while every provider we measured reported a net loss, the gap being interest and depreciation rather than operating performance.
- We estimate GPU-collateralized debt across the category at $36 billion, against which the collateral itself loses 15 to 30 percent of its resale value in its first year.
Neocloud Share of the AI Cloud Market Through 2030
In the table below, we set our estimate of total AI cloud spend against the share captured by specialist providers, and against the share of neocloud workloads that are inference rather than training.
The Neocloud Share of the AI Cloud Market, 2026
| Year | AI Cloud Market | Neocloud Revenue | Neocloud Share | Inference Share of Workloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $41B | $4.6B | 11% | 22% |
| 2025 | $72B | $11.8B | 16% | 31% |
| 2026 | $118B | $21.6B | 18% | 44% |
| 2028 (projected) | $196B | $43.1B | 22% | 63% |
| 2030 (projected) | $274B | $57.5B | 21% | 78% |
The share figure peaks before the end of the forecast period, which is the single most interesting number in this report. Specialist providers win share while capacity is scarce and while the buyers are model developers who care about interconnect quality and nothing else. As the workload mix shifts toward inference, the buyer changes: an enterprise serving a product wants the compute next to its data, its identity system, and its compliance posture, which is the hyperscalers' home ground. Our projection assumes the neoclouds answer that by moving up the stack into managed inference rather than by competing on price per GPU-hour, and the providers already doing so are the ones carrying the shortest contracts and the least debt.
Requesting a Copy of This Report
If you would like a PDF copy of this report, or the provider-level dataset behind it, you can reach out here.
Sources
- Neocloud Market Study, AI Industry Reviews, September 2026, New York, New York.
- CoreWeave Reports Strong Second Quarter 2026 Results, CoreWeave Investor Relations, August 2026, Livingston, New Jersey. https://investors.coreweave.com/news/news-details/2026/CoreWeave-Reports-Strong-Second-Quarter-2026-Results/default.aspx
- Gartner Predicts Neocloud Providers Will Capture 20% of the $267 Billion AI Cloud Market by 2030, Gartner, June 2026, Stamford, Connecticut. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-06-23-gartner-predicts-neocloud-providers-will-capture-20-percent-of-the-267-billion-dollar-ai-cloud-market-by-2030
- Best GPU Neoclouds 2026, MarkTechPost, August 2026, Sacramento, California. https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/08/23/best-gpu-neoclouds-2026/
- The State of Neocloud: Four Trends for 2026, ABI Research, 2026, New York, New York. https://www.abiresearch.com/blog/neocloud-market-trends
- Deep Dive on the Neocloud GPU Rental Industry, Luminix, June 2026, New York, New York. https://www.useluminix.com/reports/industry-analysis/deep-dive-on-the-neocloud-gpu-rental-industry-coreweave-lambda-crusoe
